Archives for January 2017

Bill Clinton’s popular sex assault accusers Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey are highly slamming the upcoming Women’s March on Washington, a celebrity-endorsed event prepared for the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration.

The march has actually been described by the news media as a female demonstration versus Trump, with reports that numerous thousands might go to.

The objective statement for the march declares that the gathering is indicated to send out a message “that ladies’s rights are human rights” and promises to combat against those who have actually demonized “survivors of sexual assault.”

Speaking with Breitbart News, Broaddrick had strong words for the march organizers:

Jones took specific offense at the involvement of Hollywood celebrities who are slated to take part in the march.

Willey stated, “Donald Trump has ‘demonized’ victims of sexual assault? Exactly exactly what do they call exactly what Bill and Hillary did to us? I’ll be sure to look for them at the inauguration.

” Hollywood is insane and they are idiots. Many of America doesn’t care about exactly what they need to say, as we all seen during the last election. When we want to go see them, these celebs need to just be there for our entertainment. Otherwise they ought to stop talking,” Jones told this press reporter.

I am a survivor of sexual assault. I are among the individuals you are apparently marching for. I was raped by Bill Clinton. Did you hear me? I are among many that Bill Clinton attacked. Where were you women when I was injuring and frightened? This previous year, I when again outlined my dreadful encounter with Bill Clinton.

Where were you? Since of your support for Hillary Clinton, you were silent. Embarassment on you; all you. I can lastly move forward because your candidate, Hillary Clinton, and Bill Clinton, my abuser, no longer matter.

Resolving the march organizers, Jones stated,

Exactly what did they do for us when we were sexually assaulted by the man that they actually support? Where were they when we were out there informing our stories once again about the Clintons, and how Hillary allowed him to do what he did, and then she covered it up and smeared us.

Celebrities who have actually validated attendance at the so-called Women’s March include Chelsea Handler, America Ferrera, Unzo Aduba, Scarlett Johnansson, Debra Messing, Padma Lakshmi, Julianne Moore, Hari Nef, Yara Shahidi, Constance Wu, Olivia Wilde, Monica Ramen, Katy Perry, Cher, Danielle Brooks, Patricia Arquette and Zendaya.

The objective declaration for the march checks out:

The Women’s March on Washington will send a vibrant message to our new government on their first day in workplace, and to the world, that ladies’s rights are human rights. We stand together, recognizing that safeguarding the most marginalized amongst us is defending everyone.

In 2005, Belafonte established the Gathering for Justice group, which has actually because been the recipient of various grants from Soros’ Open Society Foundations.

The rhetoric of the previous election cycle has actually insulted, demonized, and threatened much of us– immigrants of all statuses, Muslims and those of varied religious faiths, people who recognize as LGBTQIA, Native people, Brown and black individuals, individuals with disabilities, survivors of sexual attack– and our neighborhoods are harming and terrified. We are challenged with the question of the best ways to move on in the face of national and global concern and fear.

A number of the march “partners” are funded by Soros, consisting of: Sierra Club, Amnesty International, MoveOn.org, NAACP, Green For All, Center for Constitutional Rights, Human Rights Watch, MoveOn.org, NARAL Pro-Choice, People for the American Way and Planned Parenthood.

The official partner’s list for the Women’s March on Washington reads like a who’s who of the far-left, including groups such as CODEPINK, the Southern Poverty Law Center and 350. org.

In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, self-respect, and justice who have actually come before us, we participate diversity to show our presence in numbers undue to ignore.

Open Society likewise supported the New York production of a play starring Belafonte titled “The Exonerated” about incorrectly convicted death row inmates. Soros’ structure sponsored a series of “talk back” conversions after the play “where justice supporters and death sentence specialists from across the nation will speak and field questions from the theater audience.”

Belafonte serves on the board of the Advancement Project, which was among 4 main recipients of cash from a group created in 2008 called the Election Administration Fund. The Fund reportedly raised between $5.1 million–$ 1 million from Soros’ Open Society Institute.

Recently, Breitbart News reported the march is backed by a who’s who of far-left companies, consisting of scores of groups financed by billionaire George Soros.

Activists Gloria Steinem and Harry Belafonte are working as honorary co-chairs.

The march is led by the following four co-chairs:

Bob Bland, the CEO and creator of Manufacture New York (MNY), which his bio refers to as “a social business that is rethinking the style environment (design, advancement, distribution) and developing a brand-new, vertically-integrated business design that will change clothing & fabric production for the 21st century.”

Linda Sarsour, a self-described “Brooklyn-born Palestinian-American-Muslim racial justice and civil liberties activist,” who acts as “the Executive Director of the Arab American Association of New York, co-founder of Muslims for Ferguson, and a member of Justice League NYC,” her march bio relates.

Tamika D. Mallory, whose bio says she “has worked carefully with the Obama Administration as a supporter for civil liberties problems, equivalent rights for women, healthcare, weapon violence, and cops misconduct.” She likewise served on the shift committee of NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio.

Carmen Perez, who worked as the executive director of Belafonte’s Soros-financed The Gathering for Justice.

Source

“People have actually ended up being very emotionalized, this quiet fear of exactly what the new world will bring,” Schwab added. “We have populists here and we desire to listen. We need to react to these individuals’ fears and to use services. It’s not simply enough to listen; we need to supply responses which’s exactly what we’re here for in Davos.”

In 2017, the “Party of Davos” so to speak, the World Economic Forum’s annual event there in the Swiss Alps, is as Breitbart News has formerly reported a gloomier occasion than normal. In 2015, the world elites collected in Davos were particular that British citizens wouldn’t vote to Leave the European Union which Donald J. Trump would never ever be chosen president of the United States– which all these fears of populist uprisings around the world would never ever materialize. However they were wrong, and now Davos participants are scrambling to aim to figure out why.

Schwab stated that the Davos event is not supposed to be about the glamorous parties and receptions for the elites present, or about the “outrageous excesses of life” displayed by them there, but rather his goal is to develop a “worldwide town” where in the words of Morris and Schatzker “participants can mull weighty issues dealing with the world without the distractions of a big city.”

Klaus Schwab, who in 1971 founded the group that ultimately ended up being the World Economic Forum which hosts the annual retreat for organisation, cultural and political elites in the Swiss Alps, informed Bloomberg that the occasion in Washington, D.C.– which was formerly not prepared– is going to be meant to resolve globalist issues with the increase of populism as evidenced by the election of Trump to the presidency.

” It’s really natural that with the brand-new administration we plan a significant event in the U.S. to see exactly what are the implications of the brand-new president and how the business community might engage,” Schwab stated, including that in Davos in 2017 there are populists present who the globalists prepare to hear from to attempt to assuage a “silent worry” of the masses.

The World Economic Forum’s annual event of globalist political, monetary and cultural elitists is underway in Davos, Switzerland, but the company’s creator is preparing an emergency situation Washington, D.C., meeting in 2017 for worried elites worldwide to go over the best ways to handle President-elect Donald J. Trump.

“The World Economic Forum is listening to Donald Trump,” Bloomberg’s Stephen Morris and Erik Schatzker composed on Sunday. “The organization will assemble a special meeting in Washington this year to discuss problems raised during the president-elect’s project and the populist wave that swept him to triumph, WEF creator Klaus Schwab informed Bloomberg Television on Sunday. The event will check out U.S. investment and job-creation chances for companies that take part in the online forum, he said.”

” My biggest fear is that we will think there are really basic answers to very tough concerns,” Schwab stated. “The right service will need a lot of effort and numerous steps in the right instructions. I am positive that in a new multi-polar world we still have the concept of a joined and shared destiny.” Source

The Clinton Foundation has announced that it’s laying off 22 staffers due to the discontinuation of the Clinton Global Initiative, the Daily Caller reported.

The layoffs will happen April 15 as part of a strategy to offset criticism of the supposed pay-for-play plans throughout Clinton’s period as Secretary of State, inning accordance with a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act see the Clinton Foundation submitted with the New York Department of Labor Thursday.

In Clinton Cash, Schweizer comprehensive how the foundation operated as a pay-to-play system where it accepted donations from signed up lobbyists, corporations, and foreign governments while Hillary Clinton utilized her authority as Secretary of State to grant favors to the foundation’s benefactors.

Employees had actually already started to try to find or accept other positions at the time when the future of the company was in doubt. It is not right away clear what does it cost? of the staff will remain at the Clinton Foundation operating in some other capacity.

Peter Schweizer, Breitbart News’ editor at big and author of the book Clinton Cash, anticipated the structure would implode before the organization revealed its layoffs.

The layoffs were announced internally back in September preceeding the basic election, Politico reported.

Source

However, Harvey states he’s ready to assist the Trump administration “bring about some modification” in cities like Chicago.

” Another one they want to begin with as a target is Detroit,” Harvey informed reporters. “Ben Carson expressed that since rather naturally he is from Detroit. I wish to do something with all of the significant inner cities to see if we can bring about some modification and assist a few of these youths out. Therefore that’s why I’m here, and it was a successful conference. And he seemed truly genuine.”

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
Follow
Steve Harvey ✔ @IAmSteveHarvey
My meeting with @realDonaldTrump …
3:38 PM – 13 Jan 2017
19,731 19,731 Retweets 40,497 40,497 likes
Harvey, who endorsed Hillary Clinton for president, came under fire after it was discovered that his personnel supplied ready concerns to Clinton’s project prior to a February interview on his radio program.

Actor, comedian, and Family Feud host Steve Harvey met President-elect Donald Trump on Friday at Trump Tower in Manhattan.
” I stepped from behind my microphone and I came and talked to the person who is going to be the 45th president,” Harvey informed press reporters about his conference with Trump, whom he said he found “both sincere and congenial.”

” I left feeling like I had simply talked with a male who genuinely desires to make a distinction in this location,” he included. “I feel that something truly excellent might come out of this … I would sit with him anytime.”

” It’s an honor to be invited to talk, and I believe that’s the only way that we’re going to combine our country,” Harvey said. “We’ve got to talk.”

” Trump desires to assist with the situations in the central cities so he right away got Dr. Ben Carson on the phone to put us together to start dialog in taking a look at programs and real estate to assist our central cities and he’s very open to my mentoring efforts throughout the country,” Harvey said.

Follow
CBS News ✔ @CBSNews
” I stepped from behind my microphone and I talked and came to the person who is going to be the 45th president,” Steve Harvey said
2:51 PM – 13 Jan 2017
336 336 Retweets 693 693 likes
Harvey stated he prepares to partner with Trump’s Department of Housing and Urban Development candidate Dr. Ben Carson on restoring America’s central cities.

Source http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/01/13/steve-harvey-work-ben-carson-inner-city-policy-trump/

And so of course, globalism creates plenty of enthusiastic assistance amongst the planetary elite. And of course, the globalists have plenty of that, too. For them, Target # 1, of course, is Donald Trump.

1. The Weaponization of Rumors

Starting in July, rumors started to circulate that an examination had actually revealed bombshell revelations about Trump and the Russians. The proof was flimsy, at finest: it consisted of numerous statements, associated to unnamed sources, implicating Trump of different things.

The Mother Jones report was carefully composed, conscious that there was no evidence and, in reality, no evidence, besides the say-so of one writer, who had actually been on the payroll of anti-Trump forces. Which is to say, it was nothing– just an opposition-research dump complete of unknown unknowns. Certainly, the words might have been for a far-out unique or movie script.

Every Breitbart reader recognizes with the general details of the Russia hack story: Beginning in June 2016, someone or something called “Guccifer 2.0” was taking credit for hacking the computers of leading Democrats and, working through Julian Assange’s Wikileaks, doling out juicy information.

To puts it simply, absolutely nothing was proven, therefore even the Main Stream Media, starving as it was for anti-Trump hammers, chose not to touch the claims. The one exception was a vague October 31 product in the left-wing Mother Jones, which reported– maybe one need to state, “reported”– that a “former Western intelligence officer,” employed initially by anti-Trump Republicans, and then by Democrats, had assembled a dossier suggesting that Trump had actually been “compromised” by Russian intelligence.

The hacks were clearly harmful to the Democrats. And since the leaks showed to be true, they had considerable consequences. The discoveries forced, for example, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, to resign last July.

Meanwhile, at around the exact same time, the Democrats chose that they themselves must play the Russia Innuendo Game.

By the fall, the Democrats had a more point to make: The Russians were doing it. Was it, in reality, the Russian spy companies FSB, or GRU, that were behind the hacks? Virgil does not understand, however he does understand this: The Democrats were accusing the Russians, a minimum of at first, with no solid proof.

Quickly, the Democrats developed their counter-strategy, which can be summed up as, It’s Donald Trump’s fault. That is, whoever and whatever Guccifer was, he or it was doing the hacking to assist Trump. Once again, Blame Trump!

The Mother Jones story did have one particular nugget: We discovered that in a letter to FBI Director James Comey, outdated October 30, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid had tried, yet again, to stir the anti-Trump pot. As Reid stated:

It’s likewise possible that the Democrats didn’t press the anti-Trump story as hard as they could have– they were contented. As Obama himself has said, he and all his consultants were convinced that Hillary was going to win.

Naturally, all that smugness evaporated after Trump’s election on November 8.

In my communications with you and other top authorities in the national security neighborhood, it has ended up being clear that you possess explosive info about close ties and coordination in between Donald Trump, his leading advisors, and the Russian government– a foreign interest freely hostile to the United States.

Yet despite Reid’s best shots, the allegations still got no traction: Media outlets, no matter how pro-Hillary, were just not going to connect their trustworthiness to a report that had no verifiable basis in truth.

2. The Deep State Makes Its Moves

Ever given that Trump’s accomplishment, the anti-Trump drumbeat has grown ever louder. And of course, there might have been other political gamers– numerous others– involved in the anti-Trump effort.

It’s accurate to state that the vast bulk of DC officialdom is anti-Trump. Here at Breitbart on December 12, I had a look at this officialdom; it’s been called the “Deep State.” That is, the Deep State is the permanent political combine that runs Washington– or at least attempts to. As I defined it a month ago:

It’s obvious that the last thing that the Deep State wishes to see is the DC overload being drained. To them, it’s house!

The term “Deep State” describes the complex of bureaucrats, technocrats, and plutocrats that likes things just the method they are and wishes to keep them like that– elections be damned.

Virgil composed again about the Deep State vs. Trump on December 19, keeping in mind that the Deep State will soon have its natural leader, Barack Obama:

Virgil might keep in mind that this story was composed 3 weeks prior to Politico exposed the future ex-president’s future strategies. Here’s the heading from January 9: “Obama retools his political operation for another run: He will use his foundation and an updated Organizing for Action group to attempt to salvage his tradition and reconstruct the Democratic Party.” Simply puts, Obama will be a force to be reckoned with.

The 44th president will not be going far. Come January, he’ll be moving just a mile or two classy, to the trendy Kalorama neighborhood, where, it’s a sure thing, he’ll hold court as if he were still president. So the Deep State will still have a rallying point as it plots its next relocation against the Dreaded Trump. Or need to we say, it will have another rallying point, because, in reality, it already has plenty.

Therefore in that December 19 piece, Virgil closed with these words, which have actually shown to be prophetic:

The bitter election is over, dear reader, but the genuine storm is still to come.

Meanwhile, anti-Trump legal representatives and other activists from throughout the nation are preparing to come down on the Capitol for the Inauguration. And we just found out that Deep Staters stationed in Israel have actually warned their Israeli equivalents not to trust Trump.

Given that then, the storm has actually come on many fronts. Aside from the normal anti-Trump media, Deep Staters are pursuing other angles; for example, the career personnel at the US Department of Justice is targeting FBI Director James Comey for his pre-election handling of Hillary Clinton’s e-mail case; it’s a sure thing that these careerists, delighting in statutory autonomy within DOJ, will discover Comey in infraction of something.

The Deep State is most active inside the DC Beltway: For example, one energetic Deep State anti-Trumper is Walter Shaub, director of the Office of Government Ethics. Yes, he’s a federal worker, but Shaub has actually turned his apparently non-partisan office into a partisan device, advancing his anti-Trump project consisting of, even, on Twitter.

Remarkably, the research study group America’s Rising has actually observed that Shaub, a Democrat who donated to Obama’s 2012 re-election project, has actually never ever appeared troubled by Hillary Clinton’s several ethical disobediences. As the group puts it:

Yet the greatest broadsides, naturally, have actually been over the concern of Russian impact in the US. Even if press reporters kept away from scurrilous rumors that couldn’t be proven, they however pursued other angles, notably, that the Russians had a method for assisting Trump defeat Hillary.

For instance, in mid-December, Politico Europe added the information– make that the declared, rather than shown, information– that Russian leader Vladimir Putin “personally directed” the hacking effort, as part of his supposed “vendetta” against Hillary Clinton. Is that true? Who understands. Politico got the story, it wrote, from “several senior intelligence officials.”

And yet naturally, Shaub is still in the news all the time, always flailing at Trump. Here, for example, is a January 11 headline in The Hill, explaining Shaub’s most current attack: “Federal principles primary blasts ‘worthless’ Trump business plan.” And this, from Politico: “Federal ethics czar delivers broadside versus Trump disputes prepare.”

In this effort, obviously, journos were considerably aided by Deep Staters.

Shaub’s history as a Democrat and the double standard he utilized as head of the OGE, need to give the media time out before taking Shaub’s words seriously.

3. The Battle of the Beltway

Politico, always the specialist at stimulating the Beltway, blared its January 10 heading, “Trump challenges firestorm of Russia claims.” The story priced quote Adam Jentleson, a previous top aide to Harry Reid, as tweeting out, in all-capital letters, “THIS IS WHAT HARRY REID WAS REFERRING TO.” That is, referring back to Reid’s October 30 letter to FBI Director Comey. (We may pause to keep in mind that Jentleson is now running a “war space” for the Center for American Progress, which is to state, his complete time job is now sending out all-caps political blasts.).

Then, recently, the story heated up even hotter. And the flashpoint was that suspicious dossier– the one, as we have actually noted, that had actually been drifting around for months.

Just recently, the “Big Four” intel chiefs– that would be Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and National Security Agency Director Admiral Mike Rogers– decided that the document was worth taking seriously. That is, the “Western” operative mentioned by Mother Jones– openly identified just recently as a Briton, Christopher Steele, a former British MI-6 spy– was unexpectedly offered a promo; now, he and his info were deemed to be a trustworthy source. Credible, in fact, that the Big Four required to inform Trump all about it.

To which Virgil can say, that’s some kind of “courtesy”! Let’s believe about it: Scurrilous reports about Trump have been floating around for months, rumbling below the level of newsworthiness, and yet the Intel Quartet says that, as a “courtesy,” they will inform Trump about the reports, and then blab about it to the press.

So recently, the President-elect was informed on a few of the claims by senior US intelligence officials. And here’s exactly what’s unusual: Even though that quartet of Deep Staters is expected to be excellent at concealing, the news of that rundown instantly dripped.

And so obviously, components of the briefing, the saucy parts, ended up being huge news. After all, the Intel Quartet, in informing Trump about the charges, had provided them a type of pseudo-truthiness– and had definitely made them newsworthy. So now, for the MSM, it was open season on Trump.

As The Washington Post reported on January 10, one top official said that Trump was informed on the allegations “because they were already flowing extensively and it was ‘mostly a courtesy’ to let him know they were out there.”

CNN ran hard with the Trump story. It was “breaking news,” the channel declared, that “the nation’s leading intelligence officials” had briefed both Trump (and, at other times, Obama and Joe Biden) on information that “jeopardized President-elect Trump.”.

Group Trump hotly rejected all of it. On ABC News’ “Good Morning America,” Kellyanne Conway stated:.

Simply to smear the president-elect of the United States, we now have intelligence authorities disclosing information that they are sworn not to reveal. I don’t even believe this is fake news, I think this is simply fake.

For his part, Trump was sensible to exactly what the Deep State was doing to him. Deriding his enemies as “ill individuals,” he tweeted:

On the other hand, another severe observer, Matt Drudge, questioned if the Russians were even involved at all. That is, possibly it was the Deep State itself cranking out the claims, while tossing the blame at Moscow:.

And conservative media watchdog Brent Bozell tossed this punch:.

The leading player in the Big Smear was BuzzFeed, an online publication established by one Jonah Peretti, who had earlier discovered his trade at The Huffington Post. Yes, the site printed the full 35-page file, total with its sexual salaciousness. (Once again, we must right away state that there’s zero evidence that any of the charges hold true.).

Virgil’s not an attorney, but it sure appears to him that Smith’s admission satisfies the legal standard for character assassination, including “negligent disregard for the fact.” As one legal resource puts it:.

Thus Trump rallied his assistance; on January 12, Politico Playbook, an e-mail tipsheet for DC insiders and wannabe experts, had to grudgingly admit, “For the majority of people who enjoyed Trump the other day, it was a pretty excellent performance.”

Think of the half day of madness that started when BuzzFeed published, in full, an unsubstantiated, one-source memo, moneyed by partisans, that claimed acts– too revolting to print– by the guy a week from the Oval Office.

And here’s Glenn Greenwald, composing for The Intercept, hard-hitting as constantly. Under the headline, “The Deep State Goes to War with President-Elect, Using Unverified Claims, as Democrats Cheer,” Greenwald declared any publication of the product to be “an attack on journalism, democracy, and basic human rationality.”.

BuzzFeed’s story is clearly fake news. Any media outlet that does not produce a news story that states BuzzFeed’s story fake news is providing help and comfort to fake news and enhancing its expansion. This mess is exactly why the media’s scores are in the toilet.

Yet obviously, Trump’s harshest critics are, well, still harsh. It’s reasonable to state that the forces on both sides of the battleline– pro-Trump and anti-Trump– have now redoubled their willpower.

In the meantime, on the orthodox conservative right, National Review’s David French, himself strongly anti-Trump, composed of the BuzzFeed story:.

That is, Allen was saying, absolutely nothing is going to come of this.

This is absurd. How can “Americans comprise their own minds” when they have no ability to fact-check the allegations? The public knows nothing about the sources, absolutely nothing about the underlying claims, and has no means of finding the fact … This isn’t openness; it’s malice.

You just released fake news. You made a knowing choice to put out an untruth.

To which we can state, yes, it is a genuine document, in the sense that it has words on a page. As in, every single word on every single page might be a lie– and BuzzFeed offered the reader no aid in validating anything.

At the same time, 2 Washington Post media authors, Margaret Sullivan and Erik Wemple, denounced Buzzfeed’s choice. And on January 12, DC veteran Mike Allen– previously at Politico, now at a new start-up, Axios– dismissed the accusations:.

He included that it’s “extremely unfair that it took place, very unjust to the American people.”

Intelligence companies must never have permitted this fake news to “leakage” into the public. One last shot at me. Are we living in Nazi Germany?

Amazingly, at the very same time that he released this slime, BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith tweeted out, “There is severe reason to question the accusations.”.

Criticism from others in the media came cascading down on Buzzfeed. Speaking for the MSM, NBC News’ Chuck Todd put it right in the face of BuzzFeed’s Ben Smith:.

As we have actually concerned expect, that was some hard talk from Trump. And yet his obvious anger aside, the President-elect was likewise shrewdly firming up his base, which has actually long thought the worst about the MSM and the Deep State.

In that January 11 press conference, Trump took the chance to go on the offensive. He not only dismissed the accusations, but he likewise labeled CNN as “phony news,” no doubt provoking loud cheers all throughout Trump Nation.

Greenwald’s review regardless of, the MSM is now having its cake and consuming it too. That is, it can declare “clean hands” in not printing the claims in the beginning, but now that they’re out, it can happily reprint the claims; after all, another person printed them first, therefore making them “news.” Hence it is that casual referrals to the file are now discovering their method into MSM stories about the Trump administration, not simply stories about the Russia allegations. This is the MSM daisy-chain: a delighted circle of anti-Trumpism. Americans may not like it, however MSM-ers sure do.

Here we can pause to keep in mind that the intelligence officials obviously provided just a dry two-page summary of the allegations; we can call that the Little Smear. There was also a longer, 35-page heap of accusations, including sexual accusations; we can call that the Big Smear.

If the individual defamed was a public figure, the person making the defamatory statement can just be held liable for disparagement if he or she knew that the declaration was incorrect or if he/she showed careless disregard as to the reality or falsity of the statement. [emphasis added]
Hey there, claim?

Are corrupt US intel companies blackmailing Trump with their own dirt skillfully tagged to “Russian” operatives?

Obviously, Clapper’s retrospective remorses regardless of, the Deep State is full speed ahead, still seeking to torpedo Trump.

The Battle of the Beltway will continue.

Of course, Trump is not preparing on going anywhere; in fact, it’s been reported that staffers are currently dealing with his 2020 re-election campaign.

Previous Clinton project manager Robby Mook compares the matter to Watergate. The ramification is clear enough: Just as the Deep State succeeding in driving Richard Nixon out of workplace back in 1974, now today, the Deep State needs to seek the very same fate for Trump.

Surprisingly, in the middle of this reaction versus the now-notorious bad briefing, one of the briefers, James Clapper, has picked to distance himself from the others. Late in the night of January 11, he issued a declaration declaring that the intelligence agencies had “not made any judgment that the info in this file is reliable.” To which Virgil says: “Nice try, Mr. Clapper, however the time to speak up about your concerns was prior to the rundown, or throughout the instruction, not after the instruction– after the bleep hit the fan.”.

Source http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/01/13/virgil-deep-state-strikes-back-permanent-campaign-donald-trump/